LOGIN DASHBOARD

    Opinions

    3 MIN READ

    Let it evolve

    Gyanu Adhikari, May 17, 2017, Kathmandu

    Let it evolve

      Share this article

    Nepal’s constitution needs an amendment before the second round of elections

    (The Record)

    Only three provinces of federal Nepal voted in the May 14 local elections. It didn’t have to be that way—all seven provinces of the country could have voted, had the constitutional amendment, tabled by the ruling coalition and currently in limbo in the parliament, passed. The fact that there was a better option seems to have been forgotten in Kathmandu in recent days amid the election frenzy.

    The amendment was brought forward by the government after the Madhesi parties gave up their core demand to change the federal boundaries before the election. However, in doing so, they insisted on making the process easier by changing a rigid clause requiring all provinces to agree to any change in boundaries.

    A victory for democracy is still possible. Elections in the remaining four provinces were scheduled for June 14 to buy time to pass the amendment that will bring dissenting Madhesi parties on board. Passing this amendment will help bridge the Hill-Madhes divide. That is not the only reason to support it. The changes in the amendment will lead to a better democracy. Without it, the elections risk cementing the divisions witnessed in the run up to the promulgation of the constitution, when 50 people, the majority civilians, were killed in clashes between protesters and government forces.

    The tensions brought by the constitution, both in terms of its content and the manner in which it was adopted, have not abated. Although the leaders of Madhes-based parties are not without fault, their agenda is popular—especially among the young and educated. A large number of young people no longer care about the mainstream politics the Madhesi parties are so keen to be a part of, seeking instead to align with CK Raut, a Cambridge-educated scientist persecuted by successive governments for his secessionist views. The more rigid Kathmandu is towards the Madhesi demands, the more popular the Raut view becomes in the Madhes. The best way to counter the disastrous path advocated by CK Raut is to pass the amendment.

    In the short run, the second round of elections will witness greater violence than the hills as resentment in Madhes grows at the unwillingness of Kathmandu to address its demands. The feeling is that had such a movement happened in Kathmandu, it would have long been accommodated. Madhesi sentiments are hurt and simmering at the injustice inflicted by Kathmandu rulers who chose to respond to democratic protests with bullets. In the long run, it is quite possible that conflict will escalate, once more with tragic consequences.

    It is worth remembering that the amendment has the support of the majority of MPs. But the arithmetic in the parliament means that attempts to pass it have failed because of strong opposition from the CPN-UML. This is misguided opposition from a party that used to stand, under its progressive leader Madan Bhandari, against a rigid constitution deaf to the demands of the people.

    It is no secret that current UML head, KP Oli, is the opposite of Madan Bhandari, whose ideas still guide the party. Oli is an illiberal man (he has called intellectuals “rats”) who has stood on the side of regressive politics in times of change. In 2006, he was against the Jana Andolan, for example, and has never missed a chance since then to disparage affirmative action, or any other demand from the marginalized. “One cannot ride on an ox cart and expect to reach America,” he said in 2008, deriding the prospect of a Republican Nepal. Never a supporter of federalism, he would have preferred to retain the Panchayat’s five development regions as provinces. For Oli and his party, the first amendment brought last year, which strengthened provisions for proportional inclusion, was a mistake.

    It is obvious that KP Oli's UML feels it has found a popular yet toxic formula that mixes nationalism with development fantasy. The party promised to raise per capita income to USD 5,000, from the current 750, within 10 years and build a metro rail in Kathmandu in two years. Until a few months ago, it was disrupting the parliament to prevent discussions on the amendment. The party “allowed” the amendment to come to a vote two weeks ago only after it became certain the amendment would be defeated. KP Oli’s party will be further emboldened after the results of yesterday’s election. It will adopt an even more hostile position, and the amendment that Nepal’s already battered constitution needs is unlikely to pass.

    Plenty of examples from Nepal and other parts of the world illustrate that divisive politics can benefit a party. Thwarting the amendment may help UML win elections, but it will be a missed opportunity for the rest of the country.

    Cover photo: Scene from a local election. Bob Nichols, 1967-68. Biruwa Guthi, Parsa. 



    author bio photo

    Gyanu Adhikari  Gyanu Adhikari is a co-founder and the editor of The Record.



    Comments

    Get the best of

    the Record

    Previous Next

    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

    Features

    8 min read

    They marched against the patriarchy. Then they received rape and death threats.

    Tsering D. Gurung - February 25, 2021

    The attacks on poet Sapana Sanjeevani and leaders of the Women’s March are just one part of a pandemic of online violence against women.

    Perspectives

    5 min read

    Checking power and balancing the law

    Avasna Pandey - July 19, 2021

    By acting consistently in favor of democracy and the rule of law, Nepal’s Supreme Court has fulfilled its function of defining the limits of acceptable political action and the consequences of legal subterfuge.

    Interviews

    Perspectives

    4 min read

    Protesting minorities should be brought on board if all Nepalis are to own the constitution

    Erisha Suwal - September 21, 2015

    Mohna Ansari speaks on human rights in the Terai and the need to start meaningful dialogue with the protesters

    Features

    6 min read

    Down in the dumps

    Aishwarya Baidar - September 7, 2021

    Sisdole residents continue to suffer health and environmental problems from the thousand tonnes of garbage that are being dumped in their locale every day.

    Explainers

    3 min read

    Nepal’s quest for legalising cannabis

    The Record - March 5, 2020

    New legislation seeks to end the existing blanket ban on the sale, cultivation and production of marijuana. It would also partially lift restrictions on the use of the weed for medicinal purposes.

    Features

    8 min read

    Enabling impunity

    Dewan Rai , Bhadra Sharma - July 31, 2020

    Politicians have mastered the art of exploiting the nexus between themselves and prosecutors to always remain beyond the arm of the law

    Perspectives

    7 min read

    Turning back the clock

    Bikash Gupta - May 31, 2021

    The ongoing political crisis, a product of the aspirations of an authoritarian prime minister and a puppet president, risks destroying the country’s progress as a federal democracy.

    News

    4 min read

    Supreme Court reinstates Parliament again, thwarting Oli’s plans

    The Record - July 12, 2021

    The court has ordered that Sher Bahadur Deuba be appointed prime minister by Tuesday and that the reinstated House meet within a week’s time, by Sunday.

    • About
    • Contributors
    • Jobs
    • Contact

    CONNECT WITH US

    © Copyright the Record | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy