• Explainers
  • Podcasts
  • Longreads
  • Features
  • Photo Essays
  • Perspectives
  • Jobs
  • WRITE FOR US
Search
The Record
  • Explainers
  • Podcasts
  • Longreads
  • Features
  • Photo Essays
  • Perspectives
  • Jobs
  • WRITE FOR US

Five questions for CM Lalbabu Raut

Crime, Development, Gender, Human Rights, Identity
To help prevent incidences of rape, Nepali society and law must tackle cultural norms that apportion entitlement and agency differently to men and women
  |   November 18, 2020
By
Kalpana JhaSapana SanjeevaniPreeti A Karna • November 18, 2020
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Email
Viber
    read 4 min

    On Oct 9, the Chief Minister of Province 2, Lalbabu Raut, made a startling proclamation that “rapists should be shot in public”. He also demanded that a constitutional amendment be made to allow rapists to be punished with the death penalty. While the statements come across as obvious expressions of an entrenched patriarchy, they also indicate deeper problems in how rape is viewed in Nepal. In his attempt to appease the public through his populist verdict, Raut also conveniently shifted the attention from Nepal’s intensifying rape culture, which needs much more than criminalization to resolve. For one, the CM needs to understand that seeking refuge in such superficial solutions can only help reinforce the stereotypes of women as creatures without agency, whose purity and chastity ought to be guarded by men. Let us also bring to CM Raut’s notice that such reactions foster the reification of gendered associations, instead of encouraging society to accept women as sexually empowered beings.

    The legal system’s failure to properly account for the cultural underpinnings that inform rape has also helped smuggle in, under the guise of benevolence, the idea that the death penalty will prove to be the cure for the culture of rape. This in turn has resulted in a system that fails miserably in preventing and redressing sexual violence. The overwhelming emphasis on punishment fails to place adequate emphasis on the idea of ‘consent’–a notion that society more fully needs to understand if it wants to prevent rape. In this sense, our laws reflect a limited vision, as they are still acutely focused on proving rape by gauging force and resistance during a sexual act: Our laws are not tailored to define rape as a crime that has to do with sex without consent, instead of as a crime where force is used to overpower resistance.

    Owing to how the laws have been defined, they have failed to bring about any norm-shifting in terms of unequal gender relations. Norm-shifting is particularly important in a society like ours, where rape is rooted in the culture of patriarchy. Susan Griffin in her seminal work Rape: The Politics of Consciousness argues that “rape is an inevitable result of a culture that celebrates and rewards aggressive sexual behaviour in men, and one in which male dominance and female submissiveness have long been considered natural.” What we thus need is to change the definition of rape–to focus on whether a victim consented to an act of sex, and to establish that all unwanted sex is wrong. This change would facilitate a shift in cultural and institutional norms governing unwanted sex and help foster behavioural change and understanding of the importance of consent in sexual conduct.

    Our society is clearly one where sexual aggression of men towards women is justified; for example, it places the onus on the women for ‘instigating’ men through their unacceptable attire and behaviour, wherein the prerogative for defining what is ‘unacceptable’ emerges from a patriarchal mindset. This problem is further exacerbated by the entrenched practice of treating women as a family’s property, which relegates sexual violence against women to being the same as vandalisation of family property. The family, as defined by the patriarchy, is essentially an embodiment of cultural attitudes and social norms that ensure women’s subordination to men’s social and economic power. It is therefore important to recognise that violent acts such as rape are but an extension of women’s subordination within the family. Unless such familial arrangements are recognised as an underlying cause that increases the chances of rape and other kinds of violence against women, the problem is unlikely to find truly preventative measures as well as cure.

    Ignoring these pressing concerns and resorting, instead, to handing out death penalties would do nothing to reform a patriarchal mindset that seeks solutions through brutal punitive measures, rather than by eliminating the root cause. Furthermore, there is also no concrete evidence that the death penalty acts as a deterrent for rape; indeed, there are examples of reduced conviction rates in countries that use the death penalty. And according to a National Human Rights Council’s report, in countries that use the death penalty, victims are not only discouraged from reporting incidents of rape, but chances are also higher that the victim will be murdered by the perpetrator–to get rid of the main witness. There is also already ample evidence to show that when an attempt is made by a rape victim to file a case, they often have to face male police personnel, who can be unwilling to deal with such crimes. Therefore, while there is a need to introduce reform within the existing legal system, rape and other forms of gender-based violence need to also be recognised as the product of larger societal power structures that are designed to dominate women and create an unsafe environment for them.

    In Nepal, the focus thus needs to shift beyond criminalising and punishing perpetrators to social and legal norm-shifting. In this regard, we would like to ask CM Raut these five questions:

    1. Is the CM ready to pledge a commitment to change the socialisation of men and boys in our society?
    2. Is he ready to ask that dreaded question of why men rape or feel entitled to rape and why they inflict all kinds of violence against women? Is he ready to challenge that very notion of ‘being a man’, which derives meaning from a man’s ideas about sexual prowess? 
    3. Is he ready to challenge the beliefs from which stem the practice of treating women as family property and nothing beyond that, as well as recognise that violence outside the home is a manifestation of violence within the home?
    4. How will an environment be ensured, where in the first place, women will live free of that insidious and perpetual fear of rape? 
      Is the CM ready to take an oath to raise a son/grandson and generations of men who will not become rapists, learn to understand women as humans in their own right, with a right to their own spaces, and acknowledge that men do not have bigger claims to all spaces? Will he also first accept that rape is embedded in our culture, which expects aggression from males and passivity from females? And then, will he work to help change this culture completely?
    Facebook
    Twitter
    WhatsApp
    Email
    Viber
      Kalpana Jha
      Kalpana Jha is a PhD candidate at the University of Delhi and author of the book, 'The Madhesi Upsurge and the Contested Idea of Nepal'.
      Sapana Sanjeevani
      Sapana Sanjeevani is an independent political researcher, Mithila artist, and feminist.
      Preeti A Karna
      Preeti A Karna is a student of Masters in Development Communication at Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi.

      You May Also Like

      Gender, Human Rights, Identity, Media, Politics, World

      What mainstream feminists are getting wrong about the citizenship debate

      KALPANA JHA

      The fundamental idea of a masculine Pahadi ethno-state needs to be challenged

      Crime, Culture, Human Rights, Identity, Politics, World

      Black lives should matter to Nepalis in the US

      PRATIK NYAUPANE

      Supporting the Black Lives Matter movement goes hand in hand with actively dismantling the caste system

      Crime, Gender, Human Rights, Law

      Death penalty never the solution to crime

      ASHMITA SAPKOTA

      Demand for the reinstatement of capital punishment in the Constitution goes against Nepal’s human rights obligations

      2015 Earthquake, COVID19, Economy, Health, Natural Disaster, Politics

      Lessons from 3 crises in 5 years

      RAJENDRA SENCHUREY

      Unless Nepal comprehensively overhauls its disaster response mechanisms, we’ll continue to see the nation reeling with every crisis

      Culture, Human Rights, Identity, Indigenous Issues, Journalism, Law, World

      The killing of the dead

      KALPANA JHA

      The politics of the deaths of individual bodies, social groups, or entire populations has become increasingly normalised

      Constitution, Crime, Culture, Development, Gender, Human Rights, Identity, Journalism, Law, Politics

      ‘My vagina will vote you out!’

      THE RECORD

      Hundreds of women rallied to protest impunity in cases of rape and newly proposed immigration rules that would restrict women’s free movement.

      Cities, Development, History, Journalism, Labor, Media, World

      Why cities fail

      SOM RAJ RANA

      The Covid-19 pandemic, with its demands for physical distancing, brings with it an opportunity to reorganise and reshape our cities

      COVID19, Health, Human Rights, Identity, Journalism, Law, Media, Politics, World

      Covid19 Roundup, 2 May: Testing dismally low while PM turns into a poet

      THE RECORD

      A daily summary of Covid19 related developments that matter

      • About
      • Contributors
      • Contact

      CONNECT WITH US







      © Copyright 2021 the Record | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy