LOGIN DASHBOARD

    Perspectives

    5 MIN READ

    Hum aab Sita nai banbau

    Kalpana Jha, Pallavi Payal, February 22, 2021, Kathmandu

    Hum aab Sita nai banbau

      Share this article

    Sapana Sanjeevani’s poem took aim at the patriarchal foundations of religion and society, and for that, she’s become the target of death and rape threats.

    (The Record)

    On February 12, 2021, Sapana Sanjeevani recited her poem, ‘Hum aab Sita nai banbau’ at the women’s march, part of the ongoing ‘Nagarik andolan’, as a symbolic deconstruction  of the historic domination of women in the name of religion, culture, and tradition. In the poem, she named religious and mythological characters like Sita, Draupadi, and Saraswati to make her point. The poem, although drawing inspiration from mythological characters, was aimed at undermining the pervasive oppression of women and marginalised communities. As she recited her poem, the crowd of young and old, women and men, all cheered, joining in her call for a revolution against the patriarchy. 

    Sanjeevani was widely covered by national television and a video of her reciting the poem was viewed and shared hundreds of times on social media. Sanjeevani received immense support from many but particularly from women who could relate to her anger and the voice she represented through her poem. 

    However, since February 14, Sanjeevani, along with other women who participated in the march, began to receive threats on social media, including verbal abuse and rape and death threats. Some were extremely triggering and graphic. Sanjeevani particularly was targeted for her poem, with threats of rape and even vulgar music videos made with her photos. Madhesi activist Rita Sah, former National Human Rights Commission member Mohna Ansari, and women’s rights activist Hima Bista also received threats. Their photos were shared publicly on social media, with declarations of reward money for anyone who “blackened” their faces. 

    As close observers and participants of the women’s movement, we have supported poet Sanjeevani and the other women on social media. But even speaking out in support of these women culminated in death and rape threats against one of us. A female journalist who shared the video of Sanjeevani’s poem also received threats and was forced to take it down. Furthermore, Sah, who did not speak at the march, and Ansari, who did not speak about religion, are being targeted by religious extremists. 

    As these hostilities unfolded, the difference between the threats men, women, women from marginalised communities and minority genders receive became vividly evident. These latter groups are often the target of verbal abuse, with rape threats being common. These includes threats to gang rape them, mutilate their bodies, and toss them on the streets. The character of these threats show that women and other marginalised communities do not yet receive adequate space in constructive criticism; instead the mass turns violent and declares an attack on their bodies. 

    The bodies of women and minority genders have, directly or indirectly, always been used as a weapon of war and revenge. Many scholars of gender and violence have argued that extremist groups use sexual violence as it has extensive impacts of disrupting and destabilising families and communities, in addition to stigmatising women. These abuses are often justified in the name of religion and sanctioned based on radical interpretations of religious documents. This form of violence is particularly distinct and deeply devastating, as their consequences remain with the communities at large and continue across generations. In this particular episode, what is of particular significance is how women’s bodies have been placed at the threshold of religious conflict by the self-appointed guardians of ‘god’ and ‘religion’. 

    Most threats have involved lines like “How dare you insult our mother goddess Sita and our Hindu religion? We will rape and kill you.” This is worrying because it shows increasing intolerance and rising religious extremism in the country. The majority of threats coming from the Madhes also shows that the anger and frustration of marginalised groups are coalescing into religious extremism and communal orthodoxy. Sanjeevani, Sah, and Ansari all belong to the Madhesi community. However, the pushback from the same community they belong to reflects the deeply held belief that refuses to consider women as individuals with their own choices and voices, but rather, sees them as torchbearers of the community and the religion they belong to. 

    Sanjeevani’s poem questioned the very foundations of patriarchy and refused to idolise submissive mythological characters who are revered for tolerating extreme forms of violence. Sita, who was put through an agniparikshya to prove her chastity to Ram, is held up as an ‘ideal woman’ whereas Surpanakha, who openly expressed her love for Laxman, is portrayed as a woman of questionable character and punished by having her nose cut off (a symbol of being dishonored that can also be seen as a metaphor for sexual abuse/rape). 

    Sanjeevani’s poem challenge

    d these skewed notions of women’s characters and the dubious standards of morality. Social media trolls and men in influential positions have even resorted to calling her Surpanakha, based on these distorted interpretations of women’s characters. 

    This incident illustrates the perpetual threat of violence within which women exist. It is emblematic of the patterns of violence that cut across communities, cultures, religions, and nations, manifested in a range of atrocities directed towards women. The struggles of women in Nepal, especially those emerging  from intersectional experiences of caste, class, and ethnicity, thus needs deeper attention and engagement. The ongoing ‘Nagarik Andolan’ against the corrosion of democratic space and seeking a change in the nature of the state and the system of governance will also be incomplete without due acknowledgement of the issues associated with the women’s movement. 

    :::::

     



    author bio photo

    Kalpana Jha  Kalpana Jha is a PhD candidate at the University of Delhi and author of the book, 'The Madhesi Upsurge and the Contested Idea of Nepal'.



    author bio photo

    Pallavi Payal  Pallavi Payal is a researcher based in Kathmandu. She has a Master's in Development Studies from Roskilde University.



    Comments

    Get the best of

    the Record

    Previous Next

    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

    Features

    10 min read

    The recent warning to the govt by HRW will probably fall on deaf ears, yet again

    The Record - September 2, 2020

    Even as rights bodies continue to call out the Nepal government for its atrocities and lack of action in human rights cases, it continues with its culture of impunity

    COVID19

    News

    2 min read

    Kathmandu gradually opens up, but Covid cases keep rising

    The Record - September 10, 2020

    Kathmandu Valley sees record high coronavirus cases with the easing of prohibitory orders

    COVID19

    News

    3 min read

    Frontline workers clap back against Covid shamers, vigilantes

    The Record - August 28, 2020

    Posting stern warnings online, essential service providers turn the tables on harassers

    Features

    5 min read

    Unconscionable negligence

    The Record - May 11, 2020

    Explosives used during Nepal’s armed conflict continue to take lives

    Writing journeys

    13 min read

    Sanjay Upadhya: ‘Question your assumptions, play the devil’s advocate’

    Tom Robertson - July 28, 2021

    This week on Writing Journeys, US-based journalist and writer Sanjay Upadhya recounts his time working at The Rising Nepal under the Panchayat and the lessons he’s learned along the way.

    Features

    COVID19

    9 min read

    Nepal’s oxygen crisis is severe and ad-hoc decisions are only exacerbating it

    Marissa Taylor - May 14, 2021

    The government’s directive to not distribute oxygen to hospitals and individuals without a recommendation only caused more distress before it was withdrawn.

    Week in Politics

    6 min read

    MP wants an end to Chhaugoth demolition drive, FNJ says no to exams for journalists, Supreme Court refuses to issue stay order on Speaker appointment

    The Record - February 3, 2020

    The week in politics: what happened, what does it mean, why does it matter?

    Explainers

    7 min read

    All about uranium

    The Record - March 17, 2021

    Four Nepalis were recently arrested in possession of uranium. The Record explains what they were planning to do with it and how much it’s worth.

    • About
    • Contributors
    • Jobs
    • Contact

    CONNECT WITH US

    © Copyright the Record | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy