Features
2 MIN READ
Prominent posts tend to fall on the socially and politically more privileged Yadavs and Terai Brahmin-Chhetris
Although one of the key demands of the Madhesi movement has been proportional representation of communities, analysis of local election results shows that instead of representing the diversity of Madhesis, prominent posts tend to fall on the socially and politically more privileged Yadavs and Terai Brahmin-Chhetris.
The census of 2011 showed that the Madhesi population was 4,089439, i.e. 15.4% of Nepal. In accordance with the categorization of different population groups under the election laws, this number excludes Muslims, Terai Dalits and Terai Janajatis. Of the total population of the group categorized as Madhesis, 1054458 (4 % of Nepal’s population) are Yadav and 22,0660 (0.8%) are Terai Brahmin-Chhetri. The remaining are categorized in this article as 'Madhesi Other', and includes communities such as Mahato, Sah, Sudi, and Thakurs, and this group makes up 10.5% of the population of Nepal.
Analyzing group distributions among Madhesi local representatives
Among the elected Madhesis, 1,251 (29.2%) are Yadav, and 296 (6.9%) are Terai Brahmin-Chhetri. Taken together, the distribution of Yadav and Terai Brahmin-Chhetri appears slightly more than their share in the national Madhesi population.
Among mayoral positions, Terai Brahmin-Chhetris and Yadavs are represented more than their national percentage.
The metropolitan, sub-metropolitan and municipality levels have 293 mayors, of which 60 (20%) are Madhesis. In the mayoral post, 27 (9.2% of mayors) are Yadav and 7 (2.4%) are Terai Brahmin-Chhetri. Similarly, among the 460 Rural municipality chairs, 66 (14%) are Madhesis. Among these Madhesi chairpersons, 29 are Yadav, and 6 are Terai Brahmin-Chhetri.
In the deputy mayor position Terai Brahmin-Chhetri outnumber Yadavs
Of the total 293 total deputy mayors, 49 (17%) are Madhesi. Among those Madhesi deputy mayors, 9 are Terai Brahmin-Chhetri and 5 are Yadav.
Among the major parties UML has lowest Madhesi representation
Only 5.3% of UML local representatives are Madhesis. Among Nepali Congress and Maoist local representatives, Madhesis are represented in proportion to their population (13.4% and 13.2% per party respectively). Sanghiya Samajbadi Forum and Ra Ja Pa Nepal both have more Madhesis than non-Madhesis among their local representatives.
Political affiliation of local representatives of each Madhesi group
Nepali Congress has the largest share of each group of Madhesi local representatives. For Terai Brahmin-Chhetri local representatives, their second largest affiliation is with Ra Ja Pa Nepal, while for Yadav and Other Madhesis, it is with the Sanghiya Samajbadi Forum.
Features
9 min read
What to expect with regards to local politics, American aid, immigration to the US, and the battle against climate change
News
3 min read
The Supreme Court steps in to put a stop to the NCP’s latest attempt to hoist also-rans to positions of power
Perspectives
10 min read
Patriarchy alone is not a sufficient explanation for the lack of women in candidate selection for the recently held local elections.
Perspectives
6 min read
Candidates for the local level elections are advertising more and more on social media, especially Facebook, presenting the Election Commission with new problems it must account for.
Features
2 min read
The biggest group in Province 2, Dalits will occupy almost zero positions of power in the local government.
Features
9 min read
Despite the outsized impact that migrant workers have on Nepal, they are still unable to vote in elections as Nepal has no provisions for absentee voting.
Features
2 min read
Prominent posts tend to fall on the socially and politically more privileged Yadavs and Terai Brahmin-Chhetris
